The SPL Journal of Literary Hermeneutics: A Biannual International Journal of Independent Critical Thinking https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs <h2>ABOUT THE SPLJLH JOURNAL</h2> <p><em><strong>The SPL Journal of Literary Hermeneutics: A Biannual International Journal of Independent Critical Thinking </strong></em>is an Open Access, Double-blind Peer-reviewed/Refereed Journal. It is published in the months of January and July as Winter and Monsoon Editions. The journal aims at providing a better understanding of the polyphonic literary narratives. It aims to envisage the literary narratives not as an autonomous entity but as convergence where literary and extra-literary concerns interact and influence in subtle ways. The journal is, therefore, committed to recording the responses of readers, scholars, and academicians who approach a literary text as an interpretive dialogue across cultures, literatures, themes, concepts, and genres. The overall focus of the journal is on literary hermeneutics and independent critical thinking. The Journal aims to provide a forum for all like-minded scholars, researchers, academicians, independent critical thinkers, and creative writers globally.</p> <p><strong>JOURNALS PARTICULARS</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Title: </strong><em><a href="http://www.literaryherm.org/">The SPL Journal of Literary Hermeneutics: A Biannual International Journal of Independent Critical Thinking</a></em></li> <li><strong>Frequency: </strong>Biannual</li> <li><strong>ISSN: </strong>2583-1674</li> <li><strong>Journal DOI prefox: </strong>https://doi.org/10.64846</li> <li><strong>Publisher: </strong><a href="http://www.cavemarkpublications.com/">Cavemark Publications Private Limited</a> </li> <li><strong>Chief Editor: </strong><a href="http://www.tariqfaraz.net/">Dr. Mohammad Tariq</a></li> <li><strong>Starting Year: </strong>January 2021</li> <li><strong>Indexed by:</strong> <a href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN-L/2583-1674">ROAD</a></li> <li><strong>Open Access</strong>: Yes</li> <li><strong>Subject: </strong>Literature</li> <li><strong>Language: </strong>English</li> <li><strong>Publication Format: </strong><a href="http://www.literaryherm.org/">Online</a></li> <li><strong>Publishing Timeline: </strong>12 Weeks</li> <li><strong>Acceptance Rate:</strong> 35 %</li> <li><strong>Use of AI:</strong> Not more than 10 %</li> <li><strong>Phone No.: </strong>+91-9450297747 </li> <li><strong>Email ID: </strong><a href="mailto:editor@literaryherm.org">editor@literaryherm.org</a> / <a href="mailto:literaryherm@gmail.com">literaryherm@gmail.com</a></li> <li><strong>Mobile No.: </strong>+91-7007267681</li> <li><strong>Website: </strong><a href="http://www.literaryherm.org/">www.literaryherm.org</a> / <a href="http://www.cavemarkpublications.com/">www.cavemarkpublications.com</a></li> <li><strong>Address: </strong>PN 6-7 Bhadurpur (Phool Bagh Colony), Kursi Road, Lucknow UP—226026 India</li> <li><strong>Content-type: </strong>Academic/Scholarly/Peer-Reviewed/ Refereed Review</li> <li><strong>Scope: </strong>The journal accepts unpublished works but is not limited to the following: Indian Literature in English, Pakistani English Literature, SAARC Literature, African American Literature, British Literature, American Literature, Art, Aesthetics, Myth, Culture, Folklore, Canadian Literature, Children’s Literature, Dalit Literature, Diaspora Studies, Disability Studies, Disaster Literature, English Language Teaching, Gender Studies, Postcolonial Literature, Tribal Literature, Commonwealth Literature, Comparative Literature, Cultural Studies, Cyber Literature, Linguistics, Science Fiction and Cultural Analysis and Translation Studies and Literature and theory of literature, women’s studies, world literature, etc.</li> <li><strong>Policy: </strong>Double Blind Peer Review Policy, open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Licensed under a <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a></li> <li><strong>Review</strong> <strong>Time: </strong>A fortnight.</li> </ul> <h3 data-start="95" data-end="117">Archiving Policy</h3> <p data-start="119" data-end="248">Our journal ensures long-term digital preservation of published content through participation in recognized archiving programs:</p> <ul data-start="250" data-end="782"> <li data-start="250" data-end="507"> <p data-start="252" data-end="507"><strong data-start="252" data-end="296">LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe):</strong><br data-start="296" data-end="299" />A LOCKSS license appears under <em data-start="332" data-end="379">About the Journal → Archiving: LOCKSS License</em>. This enables LOCKSS to store and distribute journal content at participating libraries via a LOCKSS Publisher Manifest page.</p> </li> <li data-start="509" data-end="782"> <p data-start="511" data-end="782"><strong data-start="511" data-end="567">CLOCKSS (Controlled Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe):</strong><br data-start="567" data-end="570" />A CLOCKSS license appears under <em data-start="604" data-end="652">About the Journal → Archiving: CLOCKSS License</em>. This enables CLOCKSS to store and distribute journal content at participating libraries via a CLOCKSS Publisher Manifest page.</p> </li> </ul> <p data-start="784" data-end="997">Through these preservation systems, the journal guarantees that its published material will remain accessible to the scholarly community, even in the event of technical failure or discontinuation of the journal.</p> <p><strong>Statement on the Use of AI Tools</strong></p> <p>The SPL Journal of Literary Hermeneutics emphasizes originality, integrity, and transparency in scholarly work. We believe that human-authored contributions provide the strongest foundation for rigorous and innovative academic research in media and communication studies.</p> <p>In alignment with these principles, the journal does not endorse or encourage the use of generative AI tools for preparing abstracts submitted for consideration. If an author opts to use such tools, they are required to disclose this in their submission. The disclosure must include:</p> <ol> <li>The name of the AI tool used.</li> <li>A description of how the tool was utilized in preparing the abstract.</li> <li>The rationale for using the tool.</li> </ol> <p>Failure to provide this disclosure may affect the evaluation and acceptance of the submission. By adhering to these guidelines, we aim to uphold the standards of academic integrity and foster a culture of ethical research practices.</p> <p data-pm-slice="1 1 []"><strong>Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs)</strong></p> <p data-pm-slice="1 1 []">Our journal provides Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for articles upon author request. A DOI is a globally recognized alphanumeric string assigned to a digital object, such as a journal article, to ensure persistent identification and permanent access on the internet. When a DOI is assigned, it will appear in the article metadata and citation information in the standardized format recommended by CrossRef. Authors who wish to have a DOI assigned to their publication should request the submission or production stage. Once assigned, the DOI will be visible on the article landing page and included in all references and indexing services, thereby enhancing the visibility, accessibility, and citability of the work.</p> <p><strong>About the Publishing System</strong></p> <div id="content"> <p id="aboutThisPublishingSystem">This journal uses Open Journal Systems which is open source journal management and publishing software developed, supported, and freely distributed by the <a href="http://pkp.sfu.ca/">Public Knowledge Project</a> under the GNU General Public License.</p> <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://literaryherm.org/public/site/images/jjm/edprocesslarge.png" alt="" width="620" height="701" /></p> <p><strong>Open Access, Double-blind Peer-reviewed/referred / Refereed Journal:</strong> Peer-review is defined as “obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from reviewers’ expert in the field of publication.” <em>The SPL Journal of Literary Hermeneutics</em> is committed to the highest standards of reviewing all publishable materials—articles, review articles, reviews, interviews—that undergo a rigorous peer-reviewing process. Literary Hermeneutics follows a double-blind peer review system after an initial editorial review at the board level. The details of the peer-review process are given below:. Upon receiving a submission, the editorial board will scrutinise the work for its originality and rigour at the board level, and all author-identifying information will be removed for blind peer review. Experts in the field do all reviews. A review report is created on the following parameters: originality, coherence, communicability, argumentation, rigour, secondary research and innovation, and factual errors. Reviewers decide whether the work will be rejected, published or needs revision. They write a substantive review report justifying their decision. If the work needs revision or has citation error(s), the Chief Editors will contact the contributors with the report specifying a period for revision. On getting a revised copy, if the reviewers feel that the work needs to be revised again, then they may ask the contributors for another quick revision. When the work is ready for publication, it will be sent to the publishing team for final editing, proofreading and publication. Reviewers will have to disclose a conflict of interest, and it will be made sure that all reviewed articles are treated confidentially before their publication. Decision:. The decisions are notified to the contributors, usually within a month. If a writer intends to withdraw his article within the stipulated time, he must seek permission by sending an email/letter of declaration to the chief editor. For two or more authors, it is necessary to seek permission and approval from the authorial team. The journal follows a double-blind peer review system after an initial editorial review at the board level. Below are the details of the peer-review process:</p> <p><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://literaryherm.org/public/site/images/jjm/mceclip0-a0f5c2772f1e57cad9b29b7c6fd1f634.png" /></p> <p> <sub>Reference: Benefits of Open Access (Sources: SPARC, righttoresearch, Kingsley &amp; Brown 2012) </sub></p> <p><strong>Benefits of Open Access </strong></p> <p>Embracing open access, this journal swiftly shares its content, fostering a global exchange of knowledge. Committed to the principle of openness, this journal grants immediate public access to its research, promoting a worldwide dissemination of information. Rapidly accessible content underscores this journal's dedication to advancing global knowledge exchange. By providing immediate open access, this journal champions the free flow of research, enriching the global intellectual community. A staunch advocate for open knowledge, this journal empowers the public with unrestricted access to its content, fostering a broader dissemination of research worldwide.</p> <p><img src="https://literaryherm.org/public/site/images/jjm/benefits-of-open-access-sources-sparc-righttoresearch-kingsley-brown-2012.png" alt="" width="850" height="541" /></p> <p> <sub>Reference: Benefits of Open Access (Sources: SPARC, righttoresearch, Kingsley &amp; Brown 2012) </sub></p> <p> </p> <p>We warmly invite your submissions to our Literature Journal, dedicated to advancing scholarly dialogue in literary studies. This journal seeks original research that offers fresh perspectives, enriches theoretical discussions, and deepens our understanding of literature across diverse traditions and contexts. We welcome studies that engage with innovative methodologies and contribute to the evolving landscape of literary scholarship. All manuscripts should be rigorously researched and carefully structured, showcasing clarity in thought and originality in approach.</p> <p>We look forward to your contributions and to collaborating in the pursuit of literary knowledge and discovery.</p> <table width="630"> <thead> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature Journal Subjects</p> </td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Comparative Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>World Literature (African, Asian, Latin American, European)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Classical Literature (Greek, Roman, Sanskrit, etc.)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>British Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>American Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Indian Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>East Asian Literature (Chinese, Japanese, Korean)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Russian and Eastern European Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Arabic and Middle Eastern Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Postcolonial Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Feminist and Gender Studies in Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>LGBTQ+ Literature and Queer Theory</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Modernist Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Contemporary Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Victorian Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Romantic Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Renaissance Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Medieval Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Baroque and Enlightenment Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature of Migration and Diaspora</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Indigenous Literature and Oral Traditions</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>African American Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Caribbean Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Latin American Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary Theory and Criticism</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Genre Studies (Poetry, Drama, Novel, Nonfiction)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Prose and Essay Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Children’s Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Young Adult Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature of the Fantastic (Fantasy, Science Fiction)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Gothic Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Horror and Supernatural Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Detective and Crime Fiction</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Satire and Humor Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Environmental Literature and Ecocriticism</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>War and Conflict Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Trauma Studies and Testimonial Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature and Psychology</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature and Philosophy</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Translation Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary Aesthetics</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary Linguistics</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary and Cultural Memory</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature Journal Subjects</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>African American Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Caribbean Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Latin American Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary Theory and Criticism</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Genre Studies (Poetry, Drama, Novel, Nonfiction)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Prose and Essay Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Children’s Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Young Adult Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature of the Fantastic (Fantasy, Science Fiction)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Gothic Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Horror and Supernatural Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Detective and Crime Fiction</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Satire and Humor Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Environmental Literature and Ecocriticism</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>War and Conflict Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Trauma Studies and Testimonial Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature and Psychology</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature and Philosophy</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Translation Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary Aesthetics</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary Linguistics</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary and Cultural Memory</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Digital Humanities</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Popular Literature and Mass Media Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Avant-Garde and Experimental Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Graphic Novels and Comics</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Autobiography, Memoir, and Life Writing</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Mythology, Folklore, and Fairy Tales</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature and Religion</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Migration and Exile Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literary Adaptation and Film Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Disability Studies in Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Legal and Political Narratives</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Narrative Theory</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Rhetoric and Composition</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Psychoanalysis and Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Cultural and Social Theory in Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Posthumanism and Science Studies</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature of Revolution and Resistance</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Ecofeminism and Environmental Justice</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Queer Ecologies in Literature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature of the Anthropocene</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="626"> <p>Literature and Technology</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> </div> Cavemark Publications Private Limited en-US The SPL Journal of Literary Hermeneutics: A Biannual International Journal of Independent Critical Thinking 2583-1674 Echoes of the Disempowered: Representations of the Subaltern in M. T. Vasudevan Nair’s Bhima: Lone Warrior https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/294 <p><strong>Aim: </strong><em>This article examines Bhima: Lone Warrior, Gita Krishnankutty’s English translation of M. T. Vasudevan Nair’s Malayalam novel Randamoozham, through Subaltern Studies, deconstruction, postcolonial hermeneutics, myth criticism, and translation theory. It argues that Nair’s retelling of the Mahabharata re-centres marginalised figures—Bhima, Karna, and Ghatotkacha—long silenced within Brahmanical–Kshatriya epic discourse. By engaging caste, lineage, tribal identity, emotional marginality, and constructions of dharma, the novel functions as a counter-epic.</em></p> <p><strong>Methodology and Approaches: </strong><em>The study employs a multidisciplinary approach. Subaltern critique draws on Gramsci, Guha, and Spivak; Derridean deconstruction unsettles epic binaries; Barthes informs myth criticism; and Venuti and Bassnett frame translation as a cultural and political practice. Close textual reading with theoretical analysis reveals how narrative voice reconfigures power structures in myth.</em></p> <p><strong>Outcome: </strong><em>Findings show that the novel disrupts epic hegemony through narrative re-centring. Bhima’s emotional marginality, Karna’s caste humiliation, and Ghatotkacha’s expendable tribal identity emerge as sites of ideological resistance. The English translation preserves cultural specificity while enhancing global accessibility.</em></p> <p><strong>Conclusion and Suggestions: </strong><em>The novel marks a significant moment in Indian mythic retellings, dismantling epic normativity and restoring dignity to silenced figures. Myth emerges as an ideological battleground open to ethical reinterpretation. Future research may pursue comparative retellings or examine translation’s role in mediating subaltern narratives.</em></p> Jyothy C. R Copyright (c) 2025 Jyothy C. R https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-12-15 2025-12-15 6 1 1 6 10.64846/SPLJLH.2026.6101 Beyond Human Exceptionalism: A Critical Analysis of Amitav Ghosh’s The Living Mountain: A Fable for Our Times https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/295 <p><strong>Aim:</strong> <em>This paper aims to critically examine and address the entanglements of cultural imagination, colonial exploitation, and the climate crisis. Drawing on the concept of imperialism and Renaissance humanism, this study critiques the role of the anthropocentric worldview in ecological collapse. It attempts to destabilise the notion of human exceptionalism by foregrounding the active presence of nonhuman agency.</em></p> <p><strong>Methodology and Approach: </strong><em>This study employs a qualitative, text-centred approach and adheres to the MLA 9 guidelines. Analysing the selected text, through the critical lenses of Anthropocene and Posthumanism, the study engages with Dipesh Chakrabarty’s notion of entangled histories and humans as geological agents, Donna Haraway’s idea of sympoiesis and multispecies kinship, and Bruno Latour’s concept of Gaia and the new climatic regime.</em></p> <p><strong>Outcome: </strong><em>Amitav Ghosh, through this intriguing fable, compels us to reimagine literature’s role in highlighting the gravity of the planetary crisis and calls for ecological consciousness. This paper, with a particular focus on challenging the paradigm of human exceptionalism, contributes to </em><em>posthumanist ecocriticism by foregrounding the intertwined histories of colonialism, capitalism and environmental catastrophe. </em></p> <p><strong>Conclusion and Suggestions:</strong> <em>The study concludes that recognising nonhuman agency and respecting ecological limits is essential for sustainable development. It suggests writing and promoting literary works that foreground nonhuman agency and reinforce the notion of coexistence.&nbsp;</em></p> Dinesh Kumar Pankaj Sharma Copyright (c) 2025 Dinesh Kumar, Pankaj Sharma https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-12-15 2025-12-15 6 1 7 16 10.64846/SPLJLH.2026.6102 A Feminist Analysis of Ardab Mutiyaran https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/296 <p><strong>Aim:</strong> <em>This paper aims to examine Ardab Mutiyaran (2019) through feminist film theory to explore how Punjabi popular cinema negotiates women’s agency and the possibility of a female gaze within the constraints of the masala genre.</em></p> <p><strong>Methodology and Approaches:</strong> <em>The study adopts a qualitative, text-based analytical approach grounded in feminist film theory. Drawing on Laura Mulvey’s concept of the male gaze and postfeminist critiques by Angela McRobbie and Mary Ann Doane, the paper conducts a close reading of the film’s narrative structure, visual style, characterisation, and use of humour.</em></p> <p><strong>Outcome:</strong> <em>The analysis demonstrates that while the film foregrounds assertive female protagonists and gestures toward women-centred storytelling, these moments of empowerment remain structurally limited by comedic framing, romantic resolution, and domestic reconciliation.</em></p> <p><strong>Conclusion and Suggestions:</strong> <em>The paper concludes that Ardab Mutiyaran functions as a transitional text that signals change without fully dismantling patriarchal narrative conventions. Future research may examine similar trends across contemporary Punjabi cinema to assess whether symbolic visibility translates into sustained narrative agency for women.</em></p> Gurjit Singh Copyright (c) 2025 Gurjit Singh https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-12-15 2025-12-15 6 1 17 30 10.64846/SPLJLH.2026.6103 Visual Semiotics and its Limitations in a Methodological Study of Damien Chazelle’s La La Land (2016) https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/297 <p><strong>Aim:</strong> <em>The paper examines the prevalence of C. S. Peirce’s semiotics in the analysis of visual-based communication models, with a specific focus on film color systems.&nbsp; In the study of film colors through the semiotics of Peirce, the paper wishes to achieve two overarching objectives. It demonstrates the challenges in the application of Peirce’s triadic sign system of icon, index, and symbol to film color. The paper strives to express the nuanced elusiveness of the systems of film color and its defiance of being categorized through a conventional set of meanings.</em></p> <p><strong>Methodology: </strong><em>The argument employs a multifaceted methodology that combines aspects of semiotics, film theory, visual hermeneutics, initiating a closely led interrogation of Damien Chazelle’s La La Land (2016) as the primary text. The theoretical model revolves around the triadic system of Peirce –&nbsp;consisting of the Icon, Index and Symbol for the reading of the film, and observe its limitations as a by-product. </em></p> <p><strong>Outcome:</strong> <em>The primary outcomes of the paper are derived through the mapping of Peirce’s semiotics, which do not always transpose directly upon film. Furthermore, it depicts the challenges in attesting color schemes such as warm-cool colors and complementary colors as conventional symbols, as their origins lie in index signs.</em></p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> <em>The argument references various films that meet the given conditions to illustrate the layered semiotic dynamics of film color. The paper highlights the solidity of Pierce’s semiotics for visual analysis. Simultaneously, it interrogates the susceptibility of color to be neatly categorized under this framework and questions the practical applicability of semiotics in tackling visual narratives. </em></p> Himanshu Balhara Copyright (c) 2025 Himanshu Balhara https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-12-15 2025-12-15 6 1 31 52 10.64846/SPLJLH.2026.6104 The Interplay of Power, Love, and Freedom in Jibanananda Das’s “Tale of City and Village” https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/298 <p><strong>Aim: </strong><em>This paper examines the intricate interplay of power, love, and freedom in Jibanananda Das’s 1930s short story “Tale of City and Village.” Moving beyond a reductive gendered binary of oppressor and oppressed, the study argues that Das presents power as a diffuse and pervasive force shaping all individuals. </em></p> <p><strong>Methodology and Approaches: </strong><em>The study adopts a close textual and theoretical approach informed by feminist criticism, socio-historical reading, and Foucauldian concepts of power and biopolitics. Character analysis is used to examine how personal relationships intersect with institutional and ideological forces, revealing the tensions between liberal agency and structural constraint.</em></p> <p><strong>Outcome: </strong><em>The findings reveal that while the character’s exercise limited autonomy in intimate spaces, they remain deeply constrained by broader social systems. Shachi demonstrates a degree of agency within marriage yet remains bound to domestic identity. Prakash, though emotionally supportive, becomes a “docile body” within capitalist office hierarchies. </em></p> <p><strong>Conclusion and Suggestions: </strong><em>The study concludes that Das offers a nuanced critique of modern subjectivity in which freedom is fragile, partial, and constantly negotiated. True liberation exists only fleetingly between personal desire and social conformity, ultimately compromised by the socio-political panopticon. Future research may further explore Das’s fiction through biopolitical or affective frameworks to deepen understanding of power, memory, and human vulnerability in modern Bengali literature.</em></p> Tapas Sarkar Copyright (c) 2025 Tapas Sarkar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-12-15 2025-12-15 6 1 53 65 10.64846/SPLJLH.2026.6105 Jane Austen's Views on Marriage and Relationship as Depicted in Pride and Prejudice https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/299 <p><strong>Aim: </strong><em>This study examines Jane Austen’s views on love, marriage, and women’s autonomy in Pride and Prejudice, highlighting how the novel negotiates emotional compatibility, moral integrity, and financial security in marital choice. Focusing on Elizabeth Bennet’s relationships with Mr. Collins, Mr. Wickham, and Mr. Darcy, it argues that Austen rejects both marriages based solely on wealth and unions formed without economic prudence. </em></p> <p><strong>Methodology and Approach: </strong><em>The research adopts a qualitative, text-centered approach grounded in close reading of Pride and Prejudice (Austen, 1813/2005) and supported by relevant secondary criticism. Key moments of proposals, refusals, and shifting affections—Elizabeth’s responses to Collins and Darcy, her attraction to Wickham, and her eventual union with Darcy—are examined within their narrative and social contexts. </em></p> <p><strong>Outcome: </strong><em>The findings show that Elizabeth embodies Austen’s rational heroine, rejecting financial expediency without affection and romance without stability. Her marriage to Darcy becomes possible only after mutual moral growth, self-correction, and recognition of economic compatibility.</em></p> <p><strong>Conclusion and Suggestions: </strong><em>Austen’s Pride and Prejudice</em><em> presents a pragmatic yet progressive model of marriage, where moral integrity and mutual esteem are central, financial security is necessary, and affection provides enduring cohesion. Elizabeth’s development underscores women’s</em> agency through discernment and self-awareness within social constraints.</p> Imran Ahmad Khan Copyright (c) 2025 Imran Ahmad Khan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-12-15 2025-12-15 6 1 66 72 10.64846/SPLJLH.2026.6106 Language, Narrative and Cultural Identity in “Decolonising the Mind” and “The Novelist as Teacher” https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/300 <p><strong>Aims:</strong> <em>This paper critically analyses the ideas presented in Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s Decolonising the Mind and Chinua Achebe’s The Novelist as Teacher, which focuses on how both writers explore language and cultural identity to colonial influence. This clearly explains how colonial language policies affected African identity and how literature became a tool for the writers to reclaim cultural pride. </em></p> <p><strong>Methodology and Approaches:</strong> <em>This study follows close reading of both essays, examining themes such as language, cultural preservation and resistance. It also includes comparative literary perspectives to understand how Achebe and Ngugi connect literature and language with cultural restoration and social responsibility.</em></p> <p><strong>Outcomes:</strong> <em>This critical analysis deepens the understanding of the role of language and culture in shaping African identity during the postcolonial period. It emphasis on how reclaiming one’s native language contributes to psychological liberation and cultural continuity.</em></p> <p><strong>Conclusion and Suggestions:</strong> <em>The study concludes that both Ngugi and Achebe view literature and language as a powerful tool for cultural resistance. While Ngugi focuses on linguistic decolonisation, Achebe uses the coloniser’s language to correct historical misrepresentations. Future researchers may extend their research on how modern African writers continue resisting cultural erasure through literature, films, media, and educational reforms.</em></p> Ruby Roshini Mokana Sundari M Copyright (c) 2025 Ruby Roshini, Mokana Sundari M https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-12-15 2025-12-15 6 1 73 79 10.64846/SPLJLH.2026.6107 An Analytical Study of the Bond between Women and Nature in the Select Short Stories of Rabindranath Tagore https://literaryherm.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/301 <p><strong>Aims: </strong><em>This paper examines Rabindranath Tagore’s portrayal of women and Nature in his short stories, highlighting the deep and symbolic bond between the two. It aims to explore how Tagore’s humanism and ecological consciousness anticipate ecofeminist ideas by presenting women as empathetic and ethically aligned with the natural world.</em></p> <p><strong>Methodology and Approaches: </strong><em>The study employs close textual and thematic analysis of selected short stories by Rabindranath Tagore. It adopts an ecofeminist critical framework, drawing upon concepts from ecocriticism and feminist theory to analyse the parallel oppression of women and Nature under patriarchal structures.</em></p> <p><strong>Outcomes: </strong><em>The analysis demonstrates that Tagore consistently associates women with care, empathy, and environmental sensitivity, suggesting a shared experience of marginalisation and exploitation. His narratives reveal an early ecological awareness that closely resonates with ecofeminist thought, particularly in critiquing patriarchal domination over both women and the natural world.</em></p> <p><strong>Conclusion and Suggestions: </strong><em>The study concludes that Tagore’s short stories offer a significant literary articulation of the interconnectedness of women and Nature, predating formal ecofeminist discourse. His work challenges patriarchal values and advocates a harmonious relationship between humanity and the environment. Future research may extend this ecofeminist reading to Tagore’s novels, poetry, or comparative studies with contemporary ecological writers.</em></p> Pooja Kohali Kavita Bisht Copyright (c) 2025 Pooja Kohali, Kavita Bisht https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-12-15 2025-12-15 6 1 80 88 10.64846/SPLJLH.2026.6108